PortfoliosLab logo
RMS.PA vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RMS.PA and AAPL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.28

AAPL:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.60

AAPL:

0.63

Omega Ratio

RMS.PA:

1.08

AAPL:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.31

AAPL:

0.28

Martin Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.79

AAPL:

0.95

Ulcer Index

RMS.PA:

9.83%

AAPL:

9.81%

Daily Std Dev

RMS.PA:

27.24%

AAPL:

32.34%

Max Drawdown

RMS.PA:

-47.65%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

RMS.PA:

-12.69%

AAPL:

-23.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMS.PA:

€257.16B

AAPL:

$2.97T

EPS

RMS.PA:

€43.92

AAPL:

$6.41

PE Ratio

RMS.PA:

55.85

AAPL:

30.97

PEG Ratio

RMS.PA:

5.36

AAPL:

1.97

PS Ratio

RMS.PA:

16.95

AAPL:

7.41

PB Ratio

RMS.PA:

14.60

AAPL:

43.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€15.17B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€10.66B

AAPL:

$186.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€6.93B

AAPL:

$138.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMS.PA achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 22.92%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively lower 21.59% annualized return.


RMS.PA

YTD

6.75%

1M

8.20%

6M

19.86%

1Y

7.96%

5Y*

30.40%

10Y*

22.92%

AAPL

YTD

-20.63%

1M

4.26%

6M

-12.43%

1Y

8.82%

5Y*

21.04%

10Y*

21.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMS.PA vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMS.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMS.PA is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMS.PA and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than AAPL's 0.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
1.06%1.08%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%1.34%0.84%0.86%2.09%0.92%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) is 7.97%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that RMS.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RMS.PA vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hermès International Société en commandite par actions and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
7.67B
95.36B
(RMS.PA) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RMS.PA values in EUR, AAPL values in USD