PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQAX vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQAX vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQAX achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX has outperformed SSO with an annualized return of 38.76%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively lower 24.26% annualized return.


RMQAX

1D
-0.39%
1M
5.17%
YTD
37.04%
6M
33.32%
1Y
76.67%
3Y*
47.95%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*
38.76%

SSO

1D
-2.86%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
12.95%
6M
10.86%
1Y
42.28%
3Y*
33.83%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
24.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQAX vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
37.04%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
12.95%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQAX and SSO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.91

The correlation between RMQAX and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQAX vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQAX vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMQAXSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.34

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

9.90

+1.50

RMQAX vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQAX and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMQAX vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQAX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQAX and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQAXSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.18%

-84.67%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-18.17%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-35.21%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.18%

-46.73%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

-59.34%

-3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-6.70%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-19.53%

+6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.07%

4.28%

+2.79%

Volatility

RMQAX vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a higher volatility of 17.06% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 9.70%. This indicates that RMQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQAXSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.06%

9.70%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.56%

19.65%

+8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.62%

24.92%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.68%

33.85%

+12.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.68%

35.93%

+10.75%

RMQAX vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQAX vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

RMQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.47%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
26.47%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.65%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RMQAX and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQAX has higher volatility (17.06%) compared to SSO (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQAX dropped -63.18% vs SSO's -84.67%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQAX and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer