PortfoliosLab logo
RMBL vs. CNQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RMBL and CNQ is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RMBL vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RumbleON, Inc. (RMBL) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMBL:

-0.86

CNQ:

-0.50

Sortino Ratio

RMBL:

-1.65

CNQ:

-0.61

Omega Ratio

RMBL:

0.83

CNQ:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

RMBL:

-0.72

CNQ:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

RMBL:

-1.88

CNQ:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

RMBL:

38.16%

CNQ:

14.44%

Daily Std Dev

RMBL:

83.46%

CNQ:

31.69%

Max Drawdown

RMBL:

-99.26%

CNQ:

-81.12%

Current Drawdown

RMBL:

-99.26%

CNQ:

-22.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMBL:

$59.82M

CNQ:

$64.20B

EPS

RMBL:

-$2.20

CNQ:

$2.57

PEG Ratio

RMBL:

0.00

CNQ:

12.75

PS Ratio

RMBL:

0.05

CNQ:

1.67

PB Ratio

RMBL:

2.22

CNQ:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMBL:

$1.15B

CNQ:

$43.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMBL:

$298.90M

CNQ:

$12.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMBL:

-$18.60M

CNQ:

$18.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBL achieves a -70.90% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's -0.29% return.


RMBL

YTD

-70.90%

1M

-37.05%

6M

-76.87%

1Y

-72.38%

3Y*

-53.69%

5Y*

-27.61%

10Y*

N/A

CNQ

YTD

-0.29%

1M

5.01%

6M

-7.85%

1Y

-16.97%

3Y*

2.40%

5Y*

34.14%

10Y*

12.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RumbleON, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMBL vs. CNQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMBL is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMBL is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMBL is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMBL is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMBL is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMBL is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNQ is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNQ is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNQ is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMBL vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RumbleON, Inc. (RMBL) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBL and CNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RMBL vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

RMBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMBL
RumbleON, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
5.16%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.70%5.15%3.42%5.92%2.34%2.19%3.18%2.58%

Drawdowns

RMBL vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBL drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than CNQ's maximum drawdown of -81.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBL and CNQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RMBL vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

RumbleON, Inc. (RMBL) has a higher volatility of 24.32% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) at 8.33%. This indicates that RMBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RMBL vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RumbleON, Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20212022202320242025
244.70M
12.71B
(RMBL) Total Revenue
(CNQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMBL vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RumbleON, Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
27.5%
28.0%
(RMBL) Gross Margin
(CNQ) Gross Margin
RMBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, RumbleON, Inc. reported a gross profit of 67.20M and revenue of 244.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.

CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 12.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

RMBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, RumbleON, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.80M and revenue of 244.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 3.29B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

RMBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, RumbleON, Inc. reported a net income of -9.70M and revenue of 244.70M, resulting in a net margin of -4.0%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.