RLY vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. RLY is actively managed, while GNR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RLY returned 8.56%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for GNR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RLY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

RLY vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed GNR with an annualized return of 8.56%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.

RLY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 18.27%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

GNR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 23.12%
• 1Y: 43.10%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	17.13%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	15.63%	-11.72%	10.40%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	20.27%	28.68%	-8.27%	2.95%	10.20%	24.73%	-0.03%	16.49%	-13.19%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and GNR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012	0.90

The correlation between RLY and GNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RLY vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RLY	GNR
Energy	30.1%	37.6%
Basic Materials	25.1%	50.3%
Industrials	16.5%	0.2%
Utilities	15.9%	0.0%
Real Estate	5.4%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	6.3%
Healthcare	0.8%	0.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

RLY vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 92
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 82
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLY	GNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.64	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	3.38	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.46	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.60	5.43	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.17	21.28	+9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLY vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLY	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17	2.64	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.48	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.50	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.26	+0.11

Drawdowns

RLY vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLY	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.75%	-51.37%	+13.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.71%	-7.97%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.08%	-21.15%	+11.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	-25.66%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.17%	-48.59%	+14.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.51%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	-14.95%	+5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	2.03%	-1.01%

Volatility

RLY vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.00%, while SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLY	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	4.53%	-1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	13.23%	-5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	16.39%	-6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	20.23%	-6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.81%	21.88%	-8.07%

RLY vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RLY vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than GNR's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.47%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.86%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLY and GNR in my portfolio?

RLY and GNR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLY or GNR?

GNR has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to RLY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs GNR's -51.37%.

Which ETF is better, RLY or GNR?

On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.91% vs 8.56% for RLY. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RLY or GNR?

Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RLY or GNR?

GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RLY or GNR?

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.47% for GNR.

What is the main difference between RLY and GNR?

RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.40% for GNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.