RLTY vs. FDFIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX).

FDFIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 9, 2017.

Performance

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	1.08%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	-7.27%	17.59%	25.06%	26.27%	-9.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than FDFIX's -7.27% return.

RLTY

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDFIX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -7.59%
• YTD: -7.27%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 47
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FDFIX

FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.81	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	1.26	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	0.96	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	4.59	-3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and FDFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.81	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.71	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and FDFIX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, more than FDFIX's 1.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	9.08%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	1.20%	1.11%	1.26%	1.48%	1.70%	1.27%	1.52%	1.78%	2.16%	0.50%

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and FDFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-33.77%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-12.13%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.25%	-8.99%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-4.64%	-9.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	2.60%	+1.30%

Volatility

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) at 4.22%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	4.22%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	9.16%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	18.20%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.04%	16.91%	+6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.04%	18.68%	+4.36%