RLTY vs. FDFIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock, while FDFIX (Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Large Cap Index. Over the past 3 years, RLTY returned 15.94%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for FDFIX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than FDFIX's 8.05% return.

RLTY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 11.35%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 10.84%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDFIX

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 21.91%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	11.35%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-28.45%
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	8.05%	17.59%	25.06%	26.27%	-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and FDFIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.45

The correlation between RLTY and FDFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 64
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FDFIX

FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.85	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.52	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.33	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.61	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.17	11.45	-8.28

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and FDFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and FDFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-33.77%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-8.99%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.81%	-18.76%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-3.12%	+2.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.59%	-4.56%	-9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.04%	+1.39%

Volatility

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 3.66%, while Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	FDFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	5.03%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	10.04%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.27%	12.71%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.65%	17.06%	+5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	18.60%	+4.05%

Dividends

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than FDFIX's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	1.06%	1.11%	1.26%	1.48%	1.70%	1.27%	1.52%	1.78%	2.16%	0.50%
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	8.42%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLTY and FDFIX in my portfolio?

RLTY and FDFIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLTY or FDFIX?

FDFIX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to RLTY (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs FDFIX's -33.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.