PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RLTY vs. FDFIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and FDFIX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.54%
10.79%
RLTY
FDFIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RLTY:

1.06

FDFIX:

1.97

Sortino Ratio

RLTY:

1.47

FDFIX:

2.64

Omega Ratio

RLTY:

1.19

FDFIX:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

RLTY:

0.96

FDFIX:

2.99

Martin Ratio

RLTY:

3.32

FDFIX:

12.37

Ulcer Index

RLTY:

6.29%

FDFIX:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

RLTY:

19.76%

FDFIX:

12.81%

Max Drawdown

RLTY:

-35.45%

FDFIX:

-33.77%

Current Drawdown

RLTY:

-8.36%

FDFIX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than FDFIX's 4.11% return.


RLTY

YTD

6.41%

1M

3.44%

6M

6.54%

1Y

18.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FDFIX

YTD

4.11%

1M

2.88%

6M

10.79%

1Y

23.22%

5Y*

14.39%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RLTY vs. FDFIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RLTY is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RLTY is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RLTY is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDFIX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.061.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.472.64
The chart of Omega ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.191.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.962.99
The chart of Martin ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.3212.37
RLTY
FDFIX

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and FDFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.06
1.97
RLTY
FDFIX

Dividends

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than FDFIX's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.52%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.21%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.18%1.52%1.78%1.81%0.85%

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and FDFIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.36%
0
RLTY
FDFIX

Volatility

RLTY vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) at 3.21%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.64%
3.21%
RLTY
FDFIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab