PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLI vs. MKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLI vs. MKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RLI Corp. (RLI) and Markel Corporation (MKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RLI having a -18.06% return and MKL slightly higher at -17.31%. Over the past 10 years, RLI has outperformed MKL with an annualized return of 8.16%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.


RLI

1D
-1.73%
1M
3.08%
YTD
-18.06%
6M
-16.32%
1Y
-29.00%
3Y*
-3.56%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
8.16%

MKL

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.50%
YTD
-17.31%
6M
-13.58%
1Y
-9.20%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
6.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLI vs. MKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLI
RLI Corp.
-18.06%-19.13%27.57%3.77%24.80%10.67%18.08%33.22%16.69%0.38%
MKL
Markel Corporation
-17.31%24.53%21.57%7.77%6.77%19.42%-9.61%10.13%-8.87%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RLI and MKL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.35

The correlation between RLI and MKL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RLI:

$4.28

MKL:

$176.96

PE Ratio

RLI:

11.70

MKL:

10.05

PEG Ratio

RLI:

0.53

MKL:

0.18

PS Ratio

RLI:

3.05

MKL:

1.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLI:

$1.52B

MKL:

$16.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLI:

$481.56M

MKL:

$7.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

RLI:

$519.11M

MKL:

$2.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLI vs. MKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLI
RLI Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MKL
MKL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLI vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLI Corp. (RLI) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLIMKLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.30

-0.49

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.86

-0.56

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.93

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.46

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.66

-1.16

-0.50

RLI vs. MKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLI Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the MKL Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLI and MKL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLIMKLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.30

-0.49

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.34

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.25

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Drawdowns

RLI vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLI drawdown since its inception was -43.50%, smaller than the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLI and MKL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLIMKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.50%

-61.32%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-20.10%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.50%

-20.10%

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.50%

-28.87%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.50%

-44.66%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.15%

-18.90%

-19.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-11.39%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.17%

7.97%

+10.20%

Volatility

RLI vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison

RLI Corp. (RLI) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Markel Corporation (MKL) at 3.91%. This indicates that RLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLIMKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

3.91%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

13.04%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

18.78%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

22.41%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.50%

25.27%

+1.23%

Dividends

RLI vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison

RLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, while MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLI
RLI Corp.
9.31%4.11%3.12%2.31%6.12%2.67%1.87%2.12%2.71%4.25%4.42%4.45%

Financials

RLI vs. MKL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RLI Corp. and Markel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
42.32M
3.55B
(RLI) Total Revenue
(MKL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RLI and MKL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLI has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to MKL (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLI dropped -43.50% vs MKL's -61.32%.

MKL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLI and MKL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer