PortfoliosLab logo
RLBGX vs. EFA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RLBGX and EFA is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

RLBGX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

RLBGX:

4.34%

EFA:

17.58%

Max Drawdown

RLBGX:

-0.38%

EFA:

-61.04%

Current Drawdown

RLBGX:

-0.09%

EFA:

-0.32%

Returns By Period


RLBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EFA

YTD

13.70%

1M

8.86%

6M

10.08%

1Y

10.36%

5Y*

12.16%

10Y*

5.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RLBGX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RLBGX vs. EFA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLBGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RLBGX is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RLBGX is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RLBGX is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RLBGX is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RLBGX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RLBGX is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFA is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFA is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFA is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFA is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFA is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RLBGX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

RLBGX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than EFA's 2.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
2.85%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%3.72%

Drawdowns

RLBGX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -0.38%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and EFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RLBGX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...