PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLBGX vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLBGX vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLBGX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 10.43%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


RLBGX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.89%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.45%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
10.43%

AGG

1D
0.16%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLBGX vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
9.60%18.83%15.35%13.92%-11.85%16.10%11.20%18.95%-3.07%14.97%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.42%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RLBGX and AGG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.05

Over the past year, RLBGX and AGG have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLBGX vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLBGX
RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLBGX vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLBGXAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.22

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.70

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

5.21

+10.91

RLBGX vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLBGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLBGX and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLBGXAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.24

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.02

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.30

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.59

+0.39

Drawdowns

RLBGX vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLBGXAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-18.43%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-2.76%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-6.11%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-17.82%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

-18.43%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-1.98%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.71%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.90%

+0.64%

Volatility

RLBGX vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.29%. This indicates that RLBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLBGXAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.29%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

2.74%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

3.85%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

6.09%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

5.40%

+5.27%

RLBGX vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RLBGX vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.85%8.56%7.50%2.27%2.63%4.59%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.92%4.54%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLBGX and AGG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLBGX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to AGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLBGX dropped -22.33% vs AGG's -18.43%.

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLBGX and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer