PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RL vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RL and XLK is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

RL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
47.39%
6.28%
RL
XLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RL:

2.47

XLK:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

RL:

3.59

XLK:

1.04

Omega Ratio

RL:

1.44

XLK:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

RL:

4.77

XLK:

0.92

Martin Ratio

RL:

11.17

XLK:

3.12

Ulcer Index

RL:

7.27%

XLK:

5.01%

Daily Std Dev

RL:

32.94%

XLK:

22.95%

Max Drawdown

RL:

-68.62%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

RL:

-0.25%

XLK:

-4.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 6.58%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.78% annualized return.


RL

YTD

11.18%

1M

10.59%

6M

47.39%

1Y

78.27%

5Y*

20.17%

10Y*

6.58%

XLK

YTD

-0.34%

1M

-1.16%

6M

6.28%

1Y

15.56%

5Y*

20.62%

10Y*

20.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RL vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RL is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RL is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RL is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RL is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RL is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RL is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RL, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.470.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for RL, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.591.04
The chart of Omega ratio for RL, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.441.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for RL, currently valued at 4.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.770.92
The chart of Martin ratio for RL, currently valued at 11.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0011.173.12
RL
XLK

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.47
0.68
RL
XLK

Dividends

RL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than XLK's 0.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
1.26%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%0.97%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.66%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

RL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.25%
-4.17%
RL
XLK

Volatility

RL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) have volatilities of 8.01% and 8.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.01%
8.19%
RL
XLK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab