RL vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RL or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between RL and SMH is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RL:
1.88
SMH:
1.25
RL:
2.91
SMH:
1.76
RL:
1.35
SMH:
1.22
RL:
3.59
SMH:
1.75
RL:
8.31
SMH:
4.38
RL:
7.36%
SMH:
9.95%
RL:
32.55%
SMH:
34.83%
RL:
-68.62%
SMH:
-95.73%
RL:
-1.34%
SMH:
-13.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 61.78% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 4.37%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.34% annualized return.
RL
61.78%
13.92%
27.23%
58.53%
16.58%
4.37%
SMH
38.79%
-1.38%
-8.37%
40.07%
29.31%
27.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while SMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 1.37% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 0.97% | 0.93% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
RL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 7.83%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.