PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RL vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1,566.69%
172.14%
RL
SMH

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 46.40% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 37.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 3.77%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.12% annualized return.


RL

YTD

46.40%

1M

3.09%

6M

25.23%

1Y

75.81%

5Y (annualized)

15.43%

10Y (annualized)

3.77%

SMH

YTD

37.22%

1M

-2.98%

6M

4.21%

1Y

49.18%

5Y (annualized)

32.05%

10Y (annualized)

28.12%

Key characteristics


RLSMH
Sharpe Ratio2.211.44
Sortino Ratio3.241.95
Omega Ratio1.401.26
Calmar Ratio3.182.00
Martin Ratio9.805.45
Ulcer Index7.27%9.13%
Daily Std Dev32.28%34.45%
Max Drawdown-68.62%-95.73%
Current Drawdown-6.38%-14.69%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RL and SMH is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RL, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.211.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for RL, currently valued at 3.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.241.95
The chart of Omega ratio for RL, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.401.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for RL, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.182.00
The chart of Martin ratio for RL, currently valued at 9.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.805.45
RL
SMH

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.21
1.44
RL
SMH

Dividends

RL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SMH's 0.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
1.51%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%0.97%0.93%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.43%0.60%2.37%1.02%1.38%6.00%3.75%2.85%1.61%4.28%2.31%3.11%

Drawdowns

RL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.38%
-14.69%
RL
SMH

Volatility

RL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 8.20%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.02%
8.20%
RL
SMH