PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RJF vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RJF and VONG is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

RJF vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
49.32%
14.75%
RJF
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RJF:

2.20

VONG:

1.72

Sortino Ratio

RJF:

3.05

VONG:

2.28

Omega Ratio

RJF:

1.41

VONG:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

RJF:

3.03

VONG:

2.35

Martin Ratio

RJF:

8.33

VONG:

8.92

Ulcer Index

RJF:

6.49%

VONG:

3.46%

Daily Std Dev

RJF:

24.63%

VONG:

17.96%

Max Drawdown

RJF:

-69.68%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

RJF:

-0.36%

VONG:

-2.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJF achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RJF has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 19.03%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.15% annualized return.


RJF

YTD

11.10%

1M

11.10%

6M

49.32%

1Y

53.72%

5Y*

25.10%

10Y*

19.03%

VONG

YTD

2.12%

1M

1.23%

6M

14.75%

1Y

30.03%

5Y*

18.96%

10Y*

17.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RJF vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RJF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RJF is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RJF is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RJF is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RJF is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RJF is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RJF is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RJF vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RJF, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.201.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for RJF, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.052.28
The chart of Omega ratio for RJF, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for RJF, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.032.35
The chart of Martin ratio for RJF, currently valued at 8.33, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.008.338.92
RJF
VONG

The current RJF Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RJF and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.20
1.72
RJF
VONG

Dividends

RJF vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

RJF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than VONG's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.08%0.87%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%1.15%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.54%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

RJF vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJF drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJF and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.36%
-2.03%
RJF
VONG

Volatility

RJF vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.61%
6.37%
RJF
VONG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab