PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RJF vs. RL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RJFRL
YTD Return47.12%47.25%
1Y Return63.78%85.01%
3Y Return (Ann)19.39%21.86%
5Y Return (Ann)24.34%15.84%
10Y Return (Ann)17.49%3.97%
Sharpe Ratio2.612.59
Sortino Ratio3.553.67
Omega Ratio1.481.45
Calmar Ratio3.583.27
Martin Ratio10.5211.67
Ulcer Index6.07%7.25%
Daily Std Dev24.44%32.61%
Max Drawdown-69.68%-68.62%
Current Drawdown-0.27%-5.84%

Fundamentals


RJFRL
Market Cap$32.99B$13.02B
EPS$9.70$10.48
PE Ratio16.7320.00
PEG Ratio1.882.58
Total Revenue (TTM)$10.90B$6.74B
Gross Profit (TTM)$9.58B$4.55B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.20B$1.04B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RJF and RL is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RJF vs. RL - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RJF having a 47.12% return and RL slightly higher at 47.25%. Over the past 10 years, RJF has outperformed RL with an annualized return of 17.49%, while RL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
28.75%
27.15%
RJF
RL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RJF vs. RL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RJF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RJF, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RJF, currently valued at 3.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RJF, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RJF, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RJF, currently valued at 10.52, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.52
RL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RL, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RL, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RL, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RL, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RL, currently valued at 11.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.67

RJF vs. RL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RJF Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the RL Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RJF and RL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.61
2.59
RJF
RL

Dividends

RJF vs. RL - Dividend Comparison

RJF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than RL's 1.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.11%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%1.15%1.11%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
1.50%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%0.97%0.93%

Drawdowns

RJF vs. RL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJF drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, roughly equal to the maximum RL drawdown of -68.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJF and RL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.27%
-5.84%
RJF
RL

Volatility

RJF vs. RL - Volatility Comparison

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) has a higher volatility of 13.00% compared to Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 10.20%. This indicates that RJF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.00%
10.20%
RJF
RL

Financials

RJF vs. RL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items