PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RJF vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RJF vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJF achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RJF has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 19.04%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.97% annualized return.


RJF

1D
0.58%
1M
8.19%
6M
6.88%
YTD
10.76%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
19.04%
ALL TIME*
19.09%

MSFT

1D
3.02%
1M
19.01%
6M
8.48%
YTD
-3.48%
1Y
-10.62%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
24.97%
ALL TIME*
25.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.39B$14.79B$16.23B
$229.56M$215.33M$222.22M

RJF vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
10.76%4.74%40.83%6.12%8.32%59.48%8.70%22.80%-15.65%29.99%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-3.48%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RJF and MSFT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.33

The correlation between RJF and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RJF:

$33.81B

MSFT:

$3.45T

EPS

RJF:

$11.47

MSFT:

$17.94

PE Ratio

RJF:

15.35

MSFT:

25.91

PEG Ratio

RJF:

1.31

MSFT:

1.50

PS Ratio

RJF:

2.09

MSFT:

10.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

RJF:

$16.93B

MSFT:

$331.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RJF:

$11.26B

MSFT:

$225.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

RJF:

$2.35B

MSFT:

$207.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RJF vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RJF
RJF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RJF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RJF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RJF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RJF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RJF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RJF vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RJFMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.95

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

-0.35

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

-0.63

+1.33

RJF vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RJF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RJF and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RJF vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJF drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJF and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RJFMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.68%

-69.38%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.64%

-34.50%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.12%

-34.50%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-37.15%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.59%

-37.15%

-8.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-13.73%

+13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-21.80%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.71%

19.35%

-9.64%

Volatility

RJF vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) is 6.24%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that RJF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RJFMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

15.97%

-9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.13%

26.41%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.37%

31.93%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.96%

28.00%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.81%

27.62%

+3.19%

Dividends

RJF vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

RJF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than MSFT's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.77%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.20%1.25%0.87%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%

Financials

RJF vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RJF vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RJF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 60.48B and revenue of 90.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

RJF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 40.60B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.

RJF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 595.00M and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 35.77B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RJF and MSFT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to RJF (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RJF dropped -69.68% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

RJF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RJF and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer