PortfoliosLab logo
RJF vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RJF and AAPL is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RJF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RJF:

0.82

AAPL:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

RJF:

1.27

AAPL:

0.80

Omega Ratio

RJF:

1.17

AAPL:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

RJF:

0.82

AAPL:

0.40

Martin Ratio

RJF:

2.18

AAPL:

1.31

Ulcer Index

RJF:

10.54%

AAPL:

10.13%

Daily Std Dev

RJF:

29.92%

AAPL:

32.87%

Max Drawdown

RJF:

-69.68%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

RJF:

-10.54%

AAPL:

-18.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RJF:

$31.05B

AAPL:

$3.16T

EPS

RJF:

$10.39

AAPL:

$6.42

PE Ratio

RJF:

14.81

AAPL:

32.91

PEG Ratio

RJF:

1.88

AAPL:

2.14

PS Ratio

RJF:

2.29

AAPL:

7.89

PB Ratio

RJF:

2.54

AAPL:

47.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

RJF:

$15.44B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RJF:

$13.40B

AAPL:

$186.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

RJF:

$3.01B

AAPL:

$138.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJF achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RJF has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 16.43%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.98% annualized return.


RJF

YTD

-0.25%

1M

15.30%

6M

-3.58%

1Y

23.46%

5Y*

30.94%

10Y*

16.43%

AAPL

YTD

-15.43%

1M

7.39%

6M

-5.88%

1Y

11.79%

5Y*

22.59%

10Y*

21.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RJF vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RJF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RJF is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RJF is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RJF is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RJF is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RJF is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RJF is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RJF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RJF Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RJF and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RJF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

RJF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than AAPL's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.23%0.87%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%1.15%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

RJF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJF drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJF and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RJF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) is 6.39%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that RJF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RJF vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
3.79B
95.36B
(RJF) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RJF vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
87.9%
47.1%
(RJF) Gross Margin
(AAPL) Gross Margin
RJF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.33B and revenue of 3.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.9%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

RJF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 671.00M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

RJF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 495.00M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.