PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RIVN vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RIVN and ICLN is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

RIVN vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-15.15%
-15.49%
RIVN
ICLN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RIVN:

-0.19

ICLN:

-0.65

Sortino Ratio

RIVN:

0.27

ICLN:

-0.79

Omega Ratio

RIVN:

1.03

ICLN:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

RIVN:

-0.16

ICLN:

-0.22

Martin Ratio

RIVN:

-0.49

ICLN:

-1.40

Ulcer Index

RIVN:

31.28%

ICLN:

10.83%

Daily Std Dev

RIVN:

78.78%

ICLN:

23.30%

Max Drawdown

RIVN:

-95.12%

ICLN:

-87.11%

Current Drawdown

RIVN:

-91.74%

ICLN:

-69.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's 0.53% return.


RIVN

YTD

6.84%

1M

8.81%

6M

-15.16%

1Y

-9.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ICLN

YTD

0.53%

1M

0.44%

6M

-15.50%

1Y

-15.56%

5Y*

-0.62%

10Y*

3.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RIVN vs. ICLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIVN is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIVN is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIVN is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIVN is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIVN is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIVN is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICLN is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICLN is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICLN is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RIVN vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RIVN, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.19-0.65
The chart of Sortino ratio for RIVN, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.27-0.79
The chart of Omega ratio for RIVN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.030.91
The chart of Calmar ratio for RIVN, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.16-0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for RIVN, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.49-1.40
RIVN
ICLN

The current RIVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVN and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.19
-0.65
RIVN
ICLN

Dividends

RIVN vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.84%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%

Drawdowns

RIVN vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than ICLN's maximum drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-91.74%
-52.28%
RIVN
ICLN

Volatility

RIVN vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a higher volatility of 29.12% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 6.09%. This indicates that RIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
29.12%
6.09%
RIVN
ICLN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab