RIVN vs. IBM
RIVN (Rivian Automotive, Inc.) and IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) are both stocks. RIVN operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, RIVN returned 6.09%/yr vs 39.91%/yr for IBM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIVN vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's 12.60% return.
RIVN
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 15.11%
- YTD
- -12.28%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBM
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- 42.83%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 39.91%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
RIVN vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | -12.28% | 48.20% | -43.31% | 27.29% | -82.23% | 2.94% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 12.60% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIVN and IBM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
RIVN:
$21.60B
IBM:
$313.46B
RIVN:
-$2.90
IBM:
$11.32
RIVN:
3.80
IBM:
4.54
RIVN:
4.88
IBM:
9.51
RIVN:
$5.53B
IBM:
$68.91B
RIVN:
$57.00M
IBM:
$40.64B
RIVN:
-$3.18B
IBM:
$15.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIVN vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank
RIVN
IBM
RIVN vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIVN | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 0.73 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 0.98 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 2.14 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIVN | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.73 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.31 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
RIVN vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and IBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIVN | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.12% | -69.40% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.54% | -30.96% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.61% | -30.96% | -38.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.95% | 0.00% | -89.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.37% | -20.12% | -66.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.28% | 14.16% | +7.12% |
Volatility
RIVN vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) is 14.50%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 18.62%. This indicates that RIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIVN | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 18.62% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.74% | 33.26% | +13.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.32% | 38.35% | +24.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.37% | 26.83% | +50.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.37% | 26.42% | +50.95% |
Dividends
RIVN vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.04% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RIVN vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rivian Automotive, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIVN vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
RIVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
RIVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of -881.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -63.8%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
RIVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of -416.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIVN and IBM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (18.62%) compared to RIVN (14.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs IBM's -69.40%.
IBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIVN and IBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer