RISR vs. TLT
RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. RISR is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RISR returned 11.28%/yr vs -1.93%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. RISR charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
RISR vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.64% return.
RISR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- -1.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.75%
RISR vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 2.99% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 31.98% | -0.04% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.64% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISR and TLT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.47 |
The correlation between RISR and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (3 years) to -0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISR vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
RISR
TLT
RISR vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISR | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.54 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 1.29 | +3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISR vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISR | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -48.35% | +34.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -7.58% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.07% | -19.18% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -39.89% | +39.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -13.87% | +11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 3.17% | -2.07% |
Volatility
RISR vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) is 1.23%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that RISR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISR | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 2.21% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.95% | 6.63% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 9.50% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 15.82% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 14.91% | -3.12% |
RISR vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISR vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than TLT's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.92% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISR and TLT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to RISR (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISR dropped -14.31% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 11.28% vs -1.93% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 11.28% return vs -1.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.55% for TLT.
RISR is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for RISR and 0.15% for TLT.
RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISR and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer