RIO vs. IEP

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than IEP's 3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 11.05%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -9.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and IEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than IEP's 35.25% yield.

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than IEP's maximum drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and IEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is 12.33%, while Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) has a volatility of 14.41%. This indicates that RIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.