PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. IEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. IEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than IEP's 13.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 18.40%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -3.98% annualized return.


RIO

1D
-0.76%
1M
-14.71%
6M
11.44%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
54.83%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
18.40%

IEP

1D
0.47%
1M
1.83%
6M
8.52%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
-23.91%
5Y*
-19.08%
10Y*
-3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. IEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
15.41%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
13.12%8.23%-37.79%-58.78%18.76%12.87%-3.55%20.44%18.98%-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and IEP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$145.92B

IEP:

$5.06B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

IEP:

-$1.27

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.32

IEP:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

IEP:

$10.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

IEP:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

IEP:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. IEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IEP
IEP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOIEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.04

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.14

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

0.29

+9.10

RIO vs. IEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and IEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than IEP's maximum drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and IEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOIEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-84.21%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-16.06%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-67.81%

+43.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-77.56%

+42.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-77.56%

+40.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.81%

-71.01%

+51.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-30.68%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

7.73%

-1.86%

Volatility

RIO vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) at 4.35%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOIEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

4.35%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

13.75%

+11.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.53%

23.80%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.34%

41.01%

-11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.45%

36.31%

-5.86%

Dividends

RIO vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than IEP's 26.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
26.58%26.49%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
4.47%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. IEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.65B
2.31B
(RIO) Total Revenue
(IEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIO vs. IEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto Group and Icahn Enterprises L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.6%
0
Portfolio components
RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

IEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

IEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

IEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a net income of -612.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of -26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and IEP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to IEP (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs IEP's -84.21%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and IEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer