PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RING vs. SDG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RING and SDG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

RING vs. SDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.99%
-3.70%
RING
SDG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RING:

0.55

SDG:

-0.39

Sortino Ratio

RING:

0.93

SDG:

-0.43

Omega Ratio

RING:

1.11

SDG:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

RING:

0.32

SDG:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

RING:

1.94

SDG:

-1.04

Ulcer Index

RING:

9.10%

SDG:

5.77%

Daily Std Dev

RING:

32.28%

SDG:

15.47%

Max Drawdown

RING:

-79.48%

SDG:

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

RING:

-36.02%

SDG:

-23.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than SDG's -9.02% return.


RING

YTD

16.35%

1M

-6.07%

6M

4.83%

1Y

14.23%

5Y*

6.81%

10Y*

8.03%

SDG

YTD

-9.02%

1M

-2.76%

6M

-4.11%

1Y

-7.01%

5Y*

3.93%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RING vs. SDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SDG's 0.49% expense ratio.


SDG
iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF
Expense ratio chart for SDG: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%
Expense ratio chart for RING: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RING vs. SDG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RING, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.55-0.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for RING, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.93-0.43
The chart of Omega ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.110.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for RING, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.43-0.26
The chart of Martin ratio for RING, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.94-1.04
RING
SDG

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the SDG Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and SDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.55
-0.39
RING
SDG

Dividends

RING vs. SDG - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than SDG's 2.97% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.82%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.42%0.97%0.85%1.48%
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF
1.92%1.77%1.82%1.66%0.97%1.39%2.47%2.54%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RING vs. SDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than SDG's maximum drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and SDG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-22.07%
-23.19%
RING
SDG

Volatility

RING vs. SDG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) at 4.69%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.61%
4.69%
RING
SDG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab