RING vs. MIDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Midas Fund (MIDSX).
RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. MIDSX is managed by Midas. It was launched on Jan 7, 1986.
Performance
RING vs. MIDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RING vs. MIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 7.25% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
MIDSX Midas Fund | 3.72% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | -19.23% | 10.64% | 30.56% | -12.90% | 5.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than MIDSX's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed MIDSX with an annualized return of 17.97%, while MIDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.28% annualized return.
RING
- 1D
- 6.67%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 108.05%
- 3Y*
- 48.58%
- 5Y*
- 24.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
MIDSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -25.21%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 115.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RING vs. MIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDSX's 4.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RING vs. MIDSX — Risk / Return Rank
RING
MIDSX
RING vs. MIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RING | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.65 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.73 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.91 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.06 | 14.42 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RING | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.65 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.01 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RING and MIDSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RING vs. MIDSX - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RING vs. MIDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, smaller than the maximum MIDSX drawdown of -89.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and MIDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RING | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -89.77% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.11% | -30.18% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | -48.48% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | -57.07% | +5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.56% | -40.30% | +19.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.75% | -63.68% | +15.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 8.19% | +0.19% |
Volatility
RING vs. MIDSX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 18.16% compared to Midas Fund (MIDSX) at 15.85%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RING | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.16% | 15.85% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.56% | 36.12% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.62% | 44.35% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 33.89% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.85% | 33.34% | +3.51% |