RING vs. MIDSX

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a 38.03% return, which is significantly lower than MIDSX's 54.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed MIDSX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while MIDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.77% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDSX's 4.25% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the MIDSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and MIDSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, smaller than the maximum MIDSX drawdown of -94.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and MIDSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 13.15%, while Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.