RING vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
RING and GDXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. Both RING and GDXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RING or GDXJ.
Correlation
The correlation between RING and GDXJ is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RING vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RING:
0.58
GDXJ:
0.50
RING:
0.97
GDXJ:
0.92
RING:
1.12
GDXJ:
1.11
RING:
0.34
GDXJ:
0.23
RING:
1.99
GDXJ:
1.86
RING:
9.30%
GDXJ:
9.68%
RING:
32.08%
GDXJ:
35.84%
RING:
-79.48%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
RING:
-35.23%
GDXJ:
-67.20%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RING having a 17.79% return and GDXJ slightly lower at 17.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RING having a 8.93% annualized return and GDXJ not far behind at 8.61%.
RING
17.79%
-6.93%
5.03%
16.75%
7.06%
8.93%
GDXJ
17.04%
-6.92%
4.60%
14.95%
4.05%
8.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RING vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RING vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RING vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while GDXJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.41% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.82% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 0.85% | 1.48% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RING vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RING vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 9.35%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.