PortfoliosLab logo
RILY vs. 1288.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RILY and 1288.HK is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RILY:

-0.70

1288.HK:

1.63

Sortino Ratio

RILY:

-1.58

1288.HK:

2.36

Omega Ratio

RILY:

0.80

1288.HK:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

RILY:

-0.92

1288.HK:

3.04

Martin Ratio

RILY:

-1.16

1288.HK:

11.28

Ulcer Index

RILY:

77.14%

1288.HK:

4.69%

Daily Std Dev

RILY:

128.19%

1288.HK:

27.92%

Max Drawdown

RILY:

-99.26%

1288.HK:

-51.04%

Current Drawdown

RILY:

-97.18%

1288.HK:

-3.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RILY:

$92.10M

1288.HK:

HK$2.06T

EPS

RILY:

-$23.45

1288.HK:

HK$0.79

PEG Ratio

RILY:

0.00

1288.HK:

1.82

PS Ratio

RILY:

0.11

1288.HK:

3.56

PB Ratio

RILY:

0.77

1288.HK:

0.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

RILY:

$865.51M

1288.HK:

HK$711.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RILY:

$541.27M

1288.HK:

HK$180.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

RILY:

-$88.37M

1288.HK:

HK$77.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RILY achieves a -29.85% return, which is significantly lower than 1288.HK's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RILY has underperformed 1288.HK with an annualized return of -6.74%, while 1288.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.


RILY

YTD

-29.85%

1M

8.42%

6M

-39.59%

1Y

-89.82%

5Y*

-23.09%

10Y*

-6.74%

1288.HK

YTD

12.92%

1M

9.71%

6M

28.27%

1Y

43.47%

5Y*

19.09%

10Y*

9.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RILY vs. 1288.HK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RILY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RILY is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RILY is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RILY is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RILY is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RILY is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RILY is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

1288.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 1288.HK is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RILY Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the 1288.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RILY and 1288.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Dividend Comparison

RILY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.53%, more than 1288.HK's 7.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RILY
B. Riley Financial, Inc.
15.53%21.79%19.06%11.70%7.88%2.09%2.88%5.21%3.70%1.52%3.23%0.30%
1288.HK
Agricultural Bank Of China
7.81%5.72%8.01%9.03%8.37%7.04%5.77%6.42%5.35%6.13%7.28%5.69%

Drawdowns

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RILY drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than 1288.HK's maximum drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RILY and 1288.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Volatility Comparison

B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) has a higher volatility of 18.72% compared to Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) at 5.83%. This indicates that RILY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1288.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RILY vs. 1288.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B. Riley Financial, Inc. and Agricultural Bank Of China. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
270.78M
186.60B
(RILY) Total Revenue
(1288.HK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RILY values in USD, 1288.HK values in HKD