RIGS vs. RCTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX).
RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. RCTIX is managed by River Canyon. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014.
Performance
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | -0.97% | 7.75% | 7.49% | 10.02% | -4.07% | 4.26% | 6.42% | 11.71% | 1.82% | 9.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than RCTIX's -0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 3.30%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
RCTIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
RCTIX
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | RCTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.94 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 2.81 | -2.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.10 | -2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 12.23 | -10.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | RCTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.94 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.71 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 1.49 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.29 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and RCTIX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than RCTIX's 6.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | 6.83% | 7.31% | 7.89% | 8.50% | 5.98% | 3.02% | 5.97% | 4.97% | 3.30% | 4.89% | 2.16% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and RCTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | RCTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -10.89% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -1.50% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -6.17% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -10.89% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -1.50% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -1.09% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 0.38% | +1.66% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) at 0.91%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | RCTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 0.91% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 1.59% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 2.31% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 2.47% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 3.74% | +4.01% |