RIGS vs. PIMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX).
RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. PIMIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 30, 2007.
Performance
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | -1.36% | 11.08% | 5.45% | 9.36% | -9.07% | 2.62% | 5.84% | 8.10% | 0.63% | 8.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than PIMIX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 3.30%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.66% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
PIMIX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PIMIX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
PIMIX
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.56 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 2.25 | -1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.29 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.87 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 7.56 | -5.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.56 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.72 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 1.11 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.56 | -1.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and PIMIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than PIMIX's 5.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | 5.57% | 6.01% | 6.27% | 6.21% | 4.98% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 5.83% | 5.66% | 5.37% | 5.52% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and PIMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -13.39% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -3.69% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -13.34% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -13.39% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -3.24% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -1.69% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 0.92% | +1.12% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) at 1.88%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 1.88% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 2.64% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 4.28% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 4.75% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 4.20% | +3.55% |