PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RIG vs. NNN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RIGNNN
YTD Return-29.61%4.86%
1Y Return-31.96%18.25%
3Y Return (Ann)6.72%3.00%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.68%0.11%
10Y Return (Ann)-16.29%6.00%
Sharpe Ratio-0.690.88
Sortino Ratio-0.831.29
Omega Ratio0.911.16
Calmar Ratio-0.340.74
Martin Ratio-1.454.40
Ulcer Index22.70%3.63%
Daily Std Dev48.09%18.14%
Max Drawdown-99.48%-56.17%
Current Drawdown-96.52%-12.06%

Fundamentals


RIGNNN
Market Cap$3.91B$8.04B
EPS-$0.74$2.16
PEG Ratio-22.914.92
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.31B$867.02M
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.49B$705.94M
EBITDA (TTM)-$162.00M$795.53M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between RIG and NNN is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RIG vs. NNN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a -29.61% return, which is significantly lower than NNN's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RIG has underperformed NNN with an annualized return of -16.29%, while NNN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.40%
4.02%
RIG
NNN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RIG vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RIG, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RIG, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RIG, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RIG, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RIG, currently valued at -1.45, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.45
NNN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NNN, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NNN, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NNN, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NNN, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NNN, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.40

RIG vs. NNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the NNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIG and NNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.69
0.88
RIG
NNN

Dividends

RIG vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison

RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.48%15.33%3.40%
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
5.34%5.17%4.72%4.37%5.06%3.79%4.02%4.31%4.03%4.27%4.19%5.28%

Drawdowns

RIG vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, which is greater than NNN's maximum drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and NNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-96.52%
-12.06%
RIG
NNN

Volatility

RIG vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison

Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) at 7.75%. This indicates that RIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.04%
7.75%
RIG
NNN

Financials

RIG vs. NNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transocean Ltd. and National Retail Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items