PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RH vs. LVMUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RH vs. LVMUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH (RH) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -7.61% return, which is significantly higher than LVMUY's -26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has outperformed LVMUY with an annualized return of 19.13%, while LVMUY has yielded a comparatively lower 14.98% annualized return.


RH

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.11%
6M
-16.75%
YTD
-7.61%
1Y
-17.55%
3Y*
-24.87%
5Y*
-24.26%
10Y*
19.13%
ALL TIME*
12.69%

LVMUY

1D
0.09%
1M
-3.80%
6M
-13.93%
YTD
-26.22%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
-13.76%
5Y*
-5.54%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.79M$39.10M$55.89M

RH

RH
$121.46M$130.86M$136.75M

RH vs. LVMUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RH
RH
-7.61%-54.48%35.03%9.09%-50.15%19.76%109.61%78.18%38.99%180.81%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-26.22%18.11%-18.01%13.89%-10.84%34.13%36.97%62.30%1.61%59.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RH and LVMUY is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RH:

$3.13B

LVMUY:

$270.07B

EPS

RH:

$5.28

LVMUY:

€8.84

PE Ratio

RH:

31.36

LVMUY:

10.76

PS Ratio

RH:

0.94

LVMUY:

1.45

PB Ratio

RH:

54.79

LVMUY:

3.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

RH:

$3.43B

LVMUY:

€162.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RH:

$1.49B

LVMUY:

€107.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

RH:

$440.85M

LVMUY:

€44.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RH vs. LVMUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RH
RH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RH Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LVMUY
LVMUY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LVMUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVMUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVMUY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LVMUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVMUY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RH vs. LVMUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHLVMUYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.05

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

0.14

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

0.24

-0.83

RH vs. LVMUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RH Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the LVMUY Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RH and LVMUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RH vs. LVMUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, roughly equal to the maximum LVMUY drawdown of -80.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and LVMUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHLVMUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.72%

-80.82%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-31.47%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.17%

-44.24%

-30.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.72%

-46.56%

-38.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.72%

-46.56%

-38.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.59%

-41.38%

-36.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-20.74%

-14.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.23%

18.01%

+15.22%

Volatility

RH vs. LVMUY - Volatility Comparison

RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY) at 9.20%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVMUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHLVMUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.32%

9.20%

+8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.86%

23.52%

+24.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.02%

31.84%

+30.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.12%

32.80%

+29.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.08%

30.87%

+33.21%

Dividends

RH vs. LVMUY - Dividend Comparison

RH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVMUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.75%1.92%2.14%1.65%1.78%0.99%1.64%1.49%2.21%2.67%4.16%12.95%
RH
RH
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RH vs. LVMUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RH vs. LVMUY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RH and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 331.26M and revenue of 800.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

LVMUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a gross profit of 26.45B and revenue of 39.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.1%.

RH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported an operating income of 34.24M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

LVMUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported an operating income of 8.84B and revenue of 39.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

RH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a net income of -13.70M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.

LVMUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a net income of 5.81B and revenue of 39.41B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RH and LVMUY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RH has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to LVMUY (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs LVMUY's -80.82%.

LVMUY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RH and LVMUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer