RGTI vs. RCAT
RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) and RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RGTI in Computer Hardware, RCAT in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, RGTI returned 22.34%/yr vs 43.12%/yr for RCAT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGTI vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 88.52% return.
RGTI
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- 53.60%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 119.25%
- 3Y*
- 212.83%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- —
RCAT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 33.13%
- YTD
- 88.52%
- 6M
- 114.80%
- 1Y
- 131.42%
- 3Y*
- 148.71%
- 5Y*
- 43.12%
- 10Y*
- —
RGTI vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | 21.35% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 88.52% | -38.29% | 1,360.23% | -6.38% | -54.81% | -50.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTI and RCAT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2021 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, RGTI and RCAT have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RGTI:
$9.02B
RCAT:
$1.81B
RGTI:
-$0.71
RCAT:
-$0.78
RGTI:
851.06
RCAT:
31.07
RGTI:
15.45
RCAT:
7.57
RGTI:
$10.02M
RCAT:
$52.98M
RGTI:
$3.00M
RCAT:
$2.86M
RGTI:
-$263.06M
RCAT:
-$79.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTI vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank
RGTI
RCAT
RGTI vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTI | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.14 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.52 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | 5.09 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTI | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.38 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.05 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
RGTI vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, roughly equal to the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and RCAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTI | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.89% | -99.76% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.10% | -60.08% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | -67.16% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.89% | -92.25% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -91.04% | +38.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -95.53% | +36.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.78% | 29.72% | +19.06% |
Volatility
RGTI vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison
Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 41.33% compared to Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) at 37.55%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTI | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.33% | 37.55% | +3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.73% | 83.03% | -12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.88% | 120.67% | -12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.64% | 114.89% | +13.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.23% | 239.64% | -112.41% |
Dividends
RGTI vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither RGTI nor RCAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RGTI vs. RCAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigetti Computing Inc and Red Cat Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTI and RCAT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (41.33%) compared to RCAT (37.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs RCAT's -99.76%.
RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTI and RCAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer