RGT vs. MSFRX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX).

MSFRX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Oct 5, 1970.

Performance

RGT vs. MSFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RGT vs. MSFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGT Royce Global Value Trust, Inc.	3.51%	24.10%	14.45%	14.55%	-33.13%	16.59%	23.87%	32.36%	-17.49%	35.94%
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund	1.18%	10.98%	14.73%	10.34%	-9.70%	14.00%	9.72%	20.20%	-5.80%	12.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGT achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than MSFRX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RGT has outperformed MSFRX with an annualized return of 10.42%, while MSFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.

RGT

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -6.09%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 6.03%
• 1Y: 30.67%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

MSFRX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: 9.48%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RGT vs. MSFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGT

RGT Risk / Return Rank: 84
RGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RGT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RGT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

MSFRX

MSFRX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MSFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MSFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MSFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MSFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MSFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGT vs. MSFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	0.99	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	1.43	+0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.33	+1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	5.58	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGT vs. MSFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the MSFRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGT and MSFRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	0.99	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.70	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.77	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.65	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between RGT and MSFRX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RGT vs. MSFRX - Dividend Comparison

RGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than MSFRX's 8.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGT Royce Global Value Trust, Inc.	1.40%	1.45%	4.38%	1.54%	1.50%	20.96%	8.91%	0.51%	0.45%	1.02%	1.74%	0.00%
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund	8.67%	8.93%	14.87%	6.19%	5.38%	8.33%	6.93%	3.22%	4.99%	5.67%	3.54%	5.55%

Drawdowns

RGT vs. MSFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGT drawdown since its inception was -46.83%, which is greater than MSFRX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGT and MSFRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.83%	-37.28%	-9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-7.49%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.97%	-17.02%	-28.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.83%	-24.70%	-22.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.99%	-3.87%	-5.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.05%	-5.01%	-10.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	1.79%	+2.04%

Volatility

RGT vs. MSFRX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) at 2.49%. This indicates that RGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	2.49%	+3.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	5.06%	+6.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	9.39%	+8.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	9.76%	+9.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	10.45%	+9.62%