RGT vs. MSFRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RGT (Royce Global Value Trust, Inc.) is a stock, while MSFRX (MFS Total Return Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, RGT returned 10.51%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for MSFRX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RGT vs. MSFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGT achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than MSFRX's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RGT has outperformed MSFRX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while MSFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.97% annualized return.

RGT

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 15.88%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

MSFRX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 7.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGT vs. MSFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGT Royce Global Value Trust, Inc.	9.99%	24.10%	14.45%	14.55%	-33.13%	16.59%	23.87%	32.36%	-17.49%	35.94%
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund	2.98%	10.98%	14.73%	10.34%	-9.70%	14.00%	9.72%	20.20%	-5.80%	12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RGT and MSFRX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013	0.66

The correlation between RGT and MSFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RGT vs. MSFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGT

RGT Risk / Return Rank: 81
RGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
RGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RGT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
RGT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

MSFRX

MSFRX Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MSFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MSFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MSFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MSFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGT vs. MSFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.72	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.60	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.35	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.01	7.07	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGT vs. MSFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MSFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGT and MSFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.72	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.65	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.76	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.65	-0.26

Drawdowns

RGT vs. MSFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGT drawdown since its inception was -46.83%, which is greater than MSFRX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGT and MSFRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.83%	-37.28%	-9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-4.96%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.99%	-8.56%	-10.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.97%	-17.02%	-28.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.83%	-24.70%	-22.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-2.16%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.90%	-5.00%	-9.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	1.65%	+2.28%

Volatility

RGT vs. MSFRX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) at 1.78%. This indicates that RGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGT	MSFRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	1.78%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.18%	4.93%	+7.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	6.75%	+8.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	9.74%	+9.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	10.45%	+9.66%

Dividends

RGT vs. MSFRX - Dividend Comparison

RGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MSFRX's 8.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund	8.80%	8.93%	14.87%	6.19%	5.38%	8.33%	6.93%	3.22%	4.99%	5.67%	3.54%	5.55%
RGT Royce Global Value Trust, Inc.	1.32%	1.45%	4.38%	1.54%	1.50%	20.96%	8.91%	0.51%	0.45%	1.02%	1.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGT and MSFRX in my portfolio?

RGT and MSFRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGT or MSFRX?

RGT has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to MSFRX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGT dropped -46.83% vs MSFRX's -37.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.