RGLD vs. SI=F

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Silver (SI=F).

Performance

RGLD vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Silver (SI=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RGLD vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc.	19.18%	70.43%	10.39%	8.70%	8.51%	0.04%	-12.13%	44.27%	5.53%	31.32%
SI=F Silver	6.11%	141.44%	21.41%	0.19%	2.95%	-11.59%	47.38%	15.32%	-9.36%	7.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly higher than SI=F's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has outperformed SI=F with an annualized return of 19.11%, while SI=F has yielded a comparatively lower 17.41% annualized return.

RGLD

• 1D: 3.87%
• 1M: -13.13%
• YTD: 19.18%
• 6M: 32.70%
• 1Y: 62.49%
• 3Y*: 28.28%
• 5Y*: 20.21%
• 10Y*: 19.11%

SI=F

• 1D: 6.16%
• 1M: -15.68%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 58.42%
• 1Y: 118.37%
• 3Y*: 45.65%
• 5Y*: 24.59%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RGLD vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLD

RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 80
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 82

SI=F

SI=F Risk / Return Rank: 78
SI=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SI=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SI=F Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SI=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SI=F Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLD vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGLD	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.56	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.93	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.09	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	8.80	-1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGLD vs. SI=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the SI=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and SI=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGLD	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	1.56	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.62	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.50	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.22	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and SI=F is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than SI=F's maximum drawdown of -91.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and SI=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLD	SI=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.29%	-91.54%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.27%	-41.00%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.73%	-41.00%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.55%	-43.13%	-6.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.13%	-34.94%	+21.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.87%	-61.14%	+31.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.14%	14.41%	-5.27%

Volatility

RGLD vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 15.78%, while Silver (SI=F) has a volatility of 18.12%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGLD	SI=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.78%	18.12%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.49%	62.49%	-30.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	58.92%	-19.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.04%	37.21%	-6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.84%	33.13%	+0.71%