PortfoliosLab logo
RGEN vs. ARES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RGEN and ARES is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RGEN vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Repligen Corporation (RGEN) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RGEN:

-0.46

ARES:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

RGEN:

-0.50

ARES:

0.73

Omega Ratio

RGEN:

0.94

ARES:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

RGEN:

-0.44

ARES:

0.36

Martin Ratio

RGEN:

-1.69

ARES:

1.17

Ulcer Index

RGEN:

17.23%

ARES:

12.50%

Daily Std Dev

RGEN:

55.77%

ARES:

41.10%

Max Drawdown

RGEN:

-98.28%

ARES:

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

RGEN:

-63.56%

ARES:

-18.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGEN:

$6.64B

ARES:

$52.35B

EPS

RGEN:

-$0.43

ARES:

$1.72

PEG Ratio

RGEN:

2.59

ARES:

0.63

PS Ratio

RGEN:

10.21

ARES:

12.27

PB Ratio

RGEN:

3.41

ARES:

15.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGEN:

$645.66M

ARES:

$4.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGEN:

$275.86M

ARES:

$2.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGEN:

$118.93M

ARES:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGEN achieves a -17.92% return, which is significantly lower than ARES's -8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RGEN has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 11.30%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 28.75% annualized return.


RGEN

YTD

-17.92%

1M

-18.65%

6M

-17.13%

1Y

-25.30%

3Y*

-7.94%

5Y*

-3.27%

10Y*

11.30%

ARES

YTD

-8.75%

1M

4.79%

6M

-7.49%

1Y

12.69%

3Y*

38.35%

5Y*

39.89%

10Y*

28.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Repligen Corporation

Ares Management Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RGEN vs. ARES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RGEN is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RGEN is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RGEN is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RGEN is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RGEN is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RGEN is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARES is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARES is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARES is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARES is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARES is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARES is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RGEN vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repligen Corporation (RGEN) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RGEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGEN and ARES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RGEN vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

RGEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RGEN
Repligen Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
2.44%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%

Drawdowns

RGEN vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGEN drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEN and ARES.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RGEN vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

Repligen Corporation (RGEN) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 9.58%. This indicates that RGEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RGEN vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repligen Corporation and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
169.17M
1.09B
(RGEN) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGEN vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Repligen Corporation and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
53.7%
39.7%
(RGEN) Gross Margin
(ARES) Gross Margin
RGEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Repligen Corporation reported a gross profit of 90.76M and revenue of 169.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 431.68M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

RGEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Repligen Corporation reported an operating income of 6.58M and revenue of 169.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 67.52M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

RGEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Repligen Corporation reported a net income of 5.83M and revenue of 169.17M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 123.50M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.