RGEN vs. ARES
RGEN (Repligen Corporation) and ARES (Ares Management Corporation) are both stocks. RGEN operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while ARES operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RGEN returned 18.25%/yr vs 30.44%/yr for ARES. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGEN vs. ARES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEN achieves a -22.76% return, which is significantly lower than ARES's -19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RGEN has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 18.25%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 30.44% annualized return.
RGEN
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- -22.76%
- 6M
- -23.56%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- -5.41%
- 5Y*
- -8.08%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
ARES
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- -19.75%
- 6M
- -23.83%
- 1Y
- -20.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.25%
- 10Y*
- 30.44%
RGEN vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEN Repligen Corporation | -22.76% | 13.84% | -19.94% | 6.20% | -36.07% | 38.20% | 107.17% | 75.39% | 45.37% | 17.72% |
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -19.75% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEN and ARES is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.29 |
The correlation between RGEN and ARES shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGEN:
$0.91
ARES:
$2.83
RGEN:
139.27
ARES:
44.47
RGEN:
5.40
ARES:
1.77
RGEN:
9.38
ARES:
4.39
RGEN:
$763.34M
ARES:
$6.31B
RGEN:
$285.10M
ARES:
$4.46B
RGEN:
$156.19M
ARES:
$2.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEN vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank
RGEN
ARES
RGEN vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repligen Corporation (RGEN) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGEN | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.42 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | -0.81 | +1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGEN vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEN drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEN and ARES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEN | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.28% | -49.73% | -48.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.28% | -49.05% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.64% | -49.73% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.27% | -49.73% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.27% | -49.73% | -18.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.96% | -32.43% | -28.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -11.36% | -51.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.81% | 25.33% | -6.52% |
Volatility
RGEN vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison
Repligen Corporation (RGEN) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES) have volatilities of 12.41% and 11.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGEN | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.41% | 11.87% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.38% | 35.45% | -4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.72% | 41.68% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 37.47% | +12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 36.74% | +9.02% |
Dividends
RGEN vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison
RGEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 5.26% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
RGEN Repligen Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RGEN vs. ARES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repligen Corporation and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGEN vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison
RGEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repligen Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
RGEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repligen Corporation reported an operating income of 15.94M and revenue of 194.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
ARES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
RGEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repligen Corporation reported a net income of 8.33M and revenue of 194.26M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
ARES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGEN and ARES have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGEN has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to ARES (11.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEN dropped -98.28% vs ARES's -49.73%.
RGEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGEN and ARES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer