RFDA vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
RFDA and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RFDA or BIL.
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and BIL is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RFDA vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
RFDA:
0.47
BIL:
20.77
RFDA:
0.85
BIL:
248.91
RFDA:
1.12
BIL:
142.41
RFDA:
0.52
BIL:
439.34
RFDA:
1.85
BIL:
4,045.26
RFDA:
5.43%
BIL:
0.00%
RFDA:
19.48%
BIL:
0.23%
RFDA:
-34.61%
BIL:
-0.77%
RFDA:
-6.40%
BIL:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.48% return.
RFDA
-1.95%
9.00%
-5.31%
9.12%
15.92%
N/A
BIL
1.48%
0.31%
2.13%
4.76%
2.57%
1.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RFDA vs. BIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RFDA
BIL
RFDA vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
RFDA vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than BIL's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 2.41% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.48% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.69% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
RFDA vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...