PortfoliosLab logo
RF vs. WASH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RF and WASH is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RF vs. WASH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RF:

0.57

WASH:

0.40

Sortino Ratio

RF:

1.01

WASH:

0.91

Omega Ratio

RF:

1.14

WASH:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

RF:

0.54

WASH:

0.31

Martin Ratio

RF:

1.43

WASH:

1.08

Ulcer Index

RF:

12.13%

WASH:

15.26%

Daily Std Dev

RF:

30.72%

WASH:

38.64%

Max Drawdown

RF:

-92.65%

WASH:

-60.33%

Current Drawdown

RF:

-16.12%

WASH:

-39.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RF:

$20.19B

WASH:

$573.91M

EPS

RF:

$2.07

WASH:

-$1.64

PEG Ratio

RF:

2.90

WASH:

4.01

PS Ratio

RF:

3.03

WASH:

5.21

PB Ratio

RF:

1.20

WASH:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

RF:

$9.40B

WASH:

$211.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RF:

$6.66B

WASH:

$109.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

RF:

$2.63B

WASH:

-$34.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -2.93% return, which is significantly lower than WASH's -2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed WASH with an annualized return of 11.89%, while WASH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.34% annualized return.


RF

YTD

-2.93%

1M

17.84%

6M

-12.59%

1Y

17.35%

5Y*

24.76%

10Y*

11.89%

WASH

YTD

-2.58%

1M

8.55%

6M

-20.32%

1Y

15.21%

5Y*

7.22%

10Y*

2.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RF vs. WASH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RF is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RF is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RF is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

WASH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WASH is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WASH is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WASH is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WASH is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WASH is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WASH is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RF vs. WASH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the WASH Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and WASH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RF vs. WASH - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than WASH's 7.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.38%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%
WASH
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
7.61%5.36%6.92%4.62%3.73%4.58%3.72%3.70%2.89%2.60%3.44%3.04%

Drawdowns

RF vs. WASH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than WASH's maximum drawdown of -60.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and WASH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RF vs. WASH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 7.68%, while Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RF vs. WASH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
2.32B
102.01M
(RF) Total Revenue
(WASH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items