RF vs. HWC
RF (Regions Financial Corporation) and HWC (Hancock Whitney Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, RF returned 15.42%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for HWC. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RF vs. HWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than HWC's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed HWC with an annualized return of 15.42%, while HWC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.90% annualized return.
RF
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
HWC
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
RF vs. HWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 6.93% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 6.38% | 20.02% | 16.07% | 3.30% | -1.23% | 50.58% | -19.11% | 30.21% | -28.49% | 17.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RF and HWC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001 | 0.66 |
The correlation between RF and HWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RF:
$24.68B
HWC:
$5.53B
RF:
$2.51
HWC:
$4.90
RF:
11.31
HWC:
13.73
RF:
2.62
HWC:
3.72
RF:
1.42
HWC:
1.25
RF:
$9.62B
HWC:
$1.53B
RF:
$7.29B
HWC:
$1.12B
RF:
$2.90B
HWC:
$496.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RF vs. HWC — Risk / Return Rank
RF
HWC
RF vs. HWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.48 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 3.50 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.98 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.33 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.27 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
RF vs. HWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than HWC's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and HWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.65% | -70.93% | -21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.45% | -17.45% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.35% | -25.77% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -41.90% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.73% | -70.93% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -8.96% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -21.43% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.68% | 7.36% | +0.32% |
Volatility
RF vs. HWC - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) have volatilities of 7.68% and 7.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 7.56% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 17.26% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.95% | 26.36% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 33.34% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 39.28% | -3.35% |
Dividends
RF vs. HWC - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than HWC's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 2.75% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.23% | 3.81% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.73% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Financials
RF vs. HWC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Hancock Whitney Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RF and HWC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RF has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to HWC (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RF dropped -92.65% vs HWC's -70.93%.
RF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RF and HWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer