RF vs. HWC
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or HWC.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and HWC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RF vs. HWC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RF:
1.03
HWC:
0.39
RF:
1.63
HWC:
0.86
RF:
1.20
HWC:
1.10
RF:
1.15
HWC:
0.58
RF:
5.10
HWC:
1.52
RF:
5.38%
HWC:
8.66%
RF:
26.53%
HWC:
33.49%
RF:
-92.65%
HWC:
-70.93%
RF:
-14.43%
HWC:
-12.17%
Fundamentals
RF:
$22.37B
HWC:
$4.90B
RF:
$1.77
HWC:
$4.46
RF:
13.90
HWC:
12.77
RF:
$7.51B
HWC:
$1.56B
RF:
$8.09B
HWC:
$1.39B
RF:
$2.76B
HWC:
$458.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 25.79% return, which is significantly higher than HWC's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed HWC with an annualized return of 12.11%, while HWC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.
RF
25.79%
-10.73%
25.20%
25.92%
10.65%
12.11%
HWC
12.95%
-6.28%
20.69%
15.38%
6.99%
8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. HWC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. HWC - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than HWC's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.21% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 2.82% | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.23% | 3.81% | 3.13% | 2.62% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. HWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than HWC's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and HWC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. HWC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 7.28%, while Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. HWC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Hancock Whitney Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities