RF vs. HWC
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC).
Performance
RF vs. HWC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RF vs. HWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | -2.69% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 0.62% | 20.02% | 16.07% | 3.30% | -1.23% | 50.58% | -19.11% | 30.21% | -28.49% | 17.20% |
Fundamentals
RF:
$22.99B
HWC:
$5.33B
RF:
$2.42
HWC:
$5.71
RF:
10.80
HWC:
11.14
RF:
2.42
HWC:
3.60
RF:
1.30
HWC:
1.19
RF:
$9.61B
HWC:
$1.50B
RF:
$7.17B
HWC:
$1.08B
RF:
$2.81B
HWC:
$481.75M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than HWC's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed HWC with an annualized return of 17.02%, while HWC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.95% annualized return.
RF
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.02%
HWC
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RF vs. HWC — Risk / Return Rank
RF
HWC
RF vs. HWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.82 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 3.84 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.82 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.26 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RF and HWC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RF vs. HWC - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than HWC's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.00% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 2.91% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.23% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. HWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than HWC's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and HWC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.65% | -70.93% | -21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.45% | -17.45% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -41.90% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.73% | -70.93% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.79% | -13.89% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -21.52% | -9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 6.86% | +0.45% |
Volatility
RF vs. HWC - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) at 5.71%. This indicates that RF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RF | HWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 5.71% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.83% | 20.24% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.81% | 30.70% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 33.75% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 39.35% | -3.33% |
Financials
RF vs. HWC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Hancock Whitney Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities