PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REXR vs. COLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REXR vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REXR achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly lower than COLD's 15.93% return.


REXR

1D
-0.15%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
-11.00%
6M
-16.34%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
-11.06%
5Y*
-6.72%
10Y*
8.33%

COLD

1D
-2.47%
1M
22.67%
YTD
15.93%
6M
36.92%
1Y
-4.87%
3Y*
-17.44%
5Y*
-14.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REXR vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REXR
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
-11.00%4.68%-28.48%5.64%-31.17%67.83%9.69%57.80%4.57%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
15.93%-36.17%-26.72%10.11%-10.89%-9.89%9.03%40.61%48.27%

Correlation

The correlation between REXR and COLD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018

0.56

The correlation between REXR and COLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REXR:

$7.76B

COLD:

$4.18B

EPS

REXR:

$0.98

COLD:

-$0.39

PS Ratio

REXR:

8.01

COLD:

1.61

PB Ratio

REXR:

0.95

COLD:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

REXR:

$988.48M

COLD:

$2.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REXR:

$605.66M

COLD:

-$101.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

REXR:

$571.77M

COLD:

$311.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REXR vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REXR
REXR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
REXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
REXR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
REXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
REXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

COLD
COLD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REXR vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REXRCOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.02

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

-0.12

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

-0.21

+0.21

REXR vs. COLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REXR and COLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REXRCOLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

-0.11

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

-0.44

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.03

+0.37

Drawdowns

REXR vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REXR drawdown since its inception was -58.65%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXR and COLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REXRCOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.65%

-70.76%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.79%

-41.15%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.89%

-67.06%

+25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.65%

-70.76%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.34%

-56.17%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-22.29%

+6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.36%

23.24%

-11.88%

Volatility

REXR vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) is 6.09%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 19.62%. This indicates that REXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REXRCOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

19.62%

-13.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.89%

35.05%

-18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

44.71%

-20.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

32.92%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

32.18%

-5.26%

Dividends

REXR vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

REXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than COLD's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
6.30%7.15%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REXR
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
5.07%4.44%4.32%2.71%2.31%1.18%1.75%1.62%2.17%3.25%2.33%3.12%

Financials

REXR vs. COLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
245.08M
629.87M
(REXR) Total Revenue
(COLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

REXR vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. and Americold Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
76.8%
0
Portfolio components
REXR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 188.32M and revenue of 245.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.8%.

COLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

REXR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. reported an operating income of 100.46M and revenue of 245.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

COLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

REXR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. reported a net income of 87.87M and revenue of 245.08M, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.

COLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


REXR and COLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COLD has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to REXR (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REXR dropped -58.65% vs COLD's -70.76%.

REXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REXR and COLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer