REREX vs. SICNX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-4 (REREX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX).
REREX is managed by American Funds. SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008.
Performance
REREX vs. SICNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REREX vs. SICNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REREX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-4 | -2.91% | 28.87% | 2.59% | 15.70% | -23.04% | 2.49% | 24.81% | 26.97% | -15.23% | 30.72% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 1.58% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REREX achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than SICNX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, REREX has underperformed SICNX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while SICNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
REREX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
SICNX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
REREX vs. SICNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
REREX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than SICNX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
REREX vs. SICNX — Risk / Return Rank
REREX
SICNX
REREX vs. SICNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-4 (REREX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REREX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.62 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.65 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 6.13 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REREX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.62 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between REREX and SICNX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
REREX vs. SICNX - Dividend Comparison
REREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.54%, while SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REREX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-4 | 14.54% | 14.12% | 4.69% | 3.67% | 1.78% | 10.03% | 0.17% | 2.86% | 6.45% | 4.75% | 1.28% | 3.10% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
REREX vs. SICNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REREX drawdown since its inception was -54.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SICNX drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REREX and SICNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REREX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.00% | -55.78% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -12.21% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.54% | -29.11% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -40.62% | +3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -9.28% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.13% | -12.28% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.28% | +0.03% |
Volatility
REREX vs. SICNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-4 (REREX) is 7.25%, while Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that REREX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SICNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REREX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 7.99% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 13.12% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 18.25% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 15.92% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 16.40% | +0.39% |