REIT vs. INDS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds. REIT is actively managed, while INDS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.38%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INDS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REIT charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.

Performance

REIT vs. INDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.64% return.

REIT

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: —

INDS

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 5.29%
• 1Y: 8.70%
• 3Y*: 2.59%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REIT vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	12.74%	-0.55%	7.11%	13.74%	-21.23%	33.56%
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	6.64%	7.78%	-12.69%	17.72%	-32.68%	54.69%

Correlation

The correlation between REIT and INDS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021	0.86

The correlation between REIT and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

REIT vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REIT	INDS
Real Estate	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

REIT vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REIT

REIT Risk / Return Rank: 30
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

INDS

INDS Risk / Return Rank: 18
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REIT vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REIT	INDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.54	+0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	0.88	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.10	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.76	+1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	2.29	+2.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REIT vs. INDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the INDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIT and INDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REIT	INDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.54	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.04	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.38	+0.01

Drawdowns

REIT vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and INDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	REIT	INDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.30%	-40.17%	+10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-12.23%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.19%	-26.96%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.30%	-40.17%	+10.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-20.47%	+17.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.39%	-15.57%	+5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	4.03%	-1.50%

Volatility

REIT vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 3.88%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REIT	INDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	5.50%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	12.14%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	16.23%	-3.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	20.16%	-1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.38%	23.11%	-4.73%

REIT vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

REIT vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison

REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than INDS's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	3.54%	3.70%	3.75%	3.11%	2.63%	1.24%	1.68%	2.26%	1.81%
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	2.80%	3.20%	3.06%	3.13%	2.81%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REIT and INDS in my portfolio?

REIT and INDS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REIT or INDS?

INDS has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to REIT (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs INDS's -40.17%.

Which ETF is better, REIT or INDS?

On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.38% vs 0.85% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REIT or INDS?

Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.38% return vs 0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REIT or INDS?

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REIT or INDS?

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.80% for REIT.

What is the main difference between REIT and INDS?

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.60% for INDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.