PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


REGL

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
3.98%
6M
4.90%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.12%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.98%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%10.17%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between REGL and VOO has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

REGL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
VOO

Financial Services

30.0%
11.6%

Industrials

15.1%
8.3%

Utilities

14.5%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.2%

Basic Materials

9.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

7.8%
1.9%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.5%

Technology

2.0%
35.7%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Financial Services

REGL
30.0%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

REGL
15.1%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

REGL
14.5%
VOO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
9.6%
VOO
10.2%

Basic Materials

REGL
9.3%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

REGL
7.8%
VOO
1.9%

Healthcare

REGL
4.5%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
3.8%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

REGL
3.4%
VOO
3.5%

Technology

REGL
2.0%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

REGL

-

VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REGLVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.16

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

14.73

-11.66

REGL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REGLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.39

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.83

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.89

-0.36

Drawdowns

REGL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-33.99%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.90%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-18.69%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-24.52%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-33.99%

-2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-0.70%

-5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-3.69%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.91%

+1.11%

Volatility

REGL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.84%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.90%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

11.80%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.81%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.01%

+0.32%

REGL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.24%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 9.12% for REGL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer