REGL vs. VDC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REGL returned 9.12%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for VDC. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.

Performance

REGL vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 9.12%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.

REGL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 4.90%
• 1Y: 9.25%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

VDC

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 6M: 4.31%
• 1Y: 1.24%
• 3Y*: 7.43%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.98%	6.89%	12.26%	5.41%	-0.62%	20.38%	7.50%	18.79%	-3.25%	10.17%
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	5.75%	2.17%	13.30%	2.38%	-1.79%	17.64%	10.86%	26.11%	-7.79%	11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and VDC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015	0.61

The correlation between REGL and VDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REGL vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REGL	VDC
Financial Services	30.0%	-
Industrials	15.1%	0.3%
Utilities	14.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	1.8%
Basic Materials	9.3%	0.3%
Real Estate	7.8%	-
Healthcare	4.5%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	97.5%
Energy	3.4%	-
Technology	2.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

REGL vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 21
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

VDC

VDC Risk / Return Rank: 9
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 9
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REGL	VDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.10	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.23	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.03	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	0.13	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	0.28	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REGL vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REGL	VDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	0.10	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.46	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.52	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.66	-0.14

Drawdowns

REGL vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and VDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGL	VDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.37%	-34.24%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-9.28%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-11.78%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-16.55%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.37%	-25.31%	-11.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-8.52%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-3.73%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	4.49%	-1.47%

Volatility

REGL vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 3.65%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGL	VDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	4.09%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	9.76%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	12.36%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	13.13%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	14.64%	+3.69%

REGL vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGL vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VDC's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.24%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	2.17%	2.26%	2.33%	2.65%	2.37%	2.14%	2.50%	2.44%	2.78%	2.52%	2.39%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGL and VDC in my portfolio?

REGL and VDC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REGL or VDC?

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs VDC's -34.24%.

Which ETF is better, REGL or VDC?

On 10-year performance, REGL leads with 9.12% vs 7.59% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REGL or VDC?

Over the 10-year period, REGL has performed better with a 9.12% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGL or VDC?

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGL or VDC?

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 2.17% for VDC.

What is the main difference between REGL and VDC?

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.09% for VDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.