RECS vs. SCHG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).

RECS and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RECS is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both RECS and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RECS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RECS vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	-4.55%	19.30%	26.27%	23.19%	-14.39%	32.73%	15.35%	-0.93%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	-10.59%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RECS has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.68%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.

RECS

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.67%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -2.31%
• 1Y: 18.70%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

SCHG

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -10.59%
• 6M: -8.51%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: 21.91%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 16.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RECS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

RECS

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

RECS vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RECS

RECS Risk / Return Rank: 65
RECS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RECS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RECS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RECS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RECS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 46
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RECS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RECS	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.75	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.23	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.17	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.03	+0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	3.54	+3.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RECS vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RECS Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RECS and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RECS	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	0.75	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.57	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.79	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.79	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between RECS and SCHG is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RECS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	1.16%	1.11%	1.09%	1.00%	1.41%	20.64%	1.09%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.43%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Drawdowns

RECS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RECS	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-34.59%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-16.41%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.08%	-34.59%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	-34.59%	+0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.34%	-13.34%	+7.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-5.22%	+3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	4.78%	-2.08%

Volatility

RECS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is 5.03%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that RECS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RECS	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	6.67%	-1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	12.51%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	22.43%	-4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.40%	22.32%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	21.51%	-5.37%