PortfoliosLab logo
REBYX vs. SCHA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between REBYX and SCHA is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

REBYX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

REBYX:

-0.15

SCHA:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

REBYX:

-0.09

SCHA:

0.34

Omega Ratio

REBYX:

0.99

SCHA:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

REBYX:

-0.15

SCHA:

0.10

Martin Ratio

REBYX:

-0.41

SCHA:

0.29

Ulcer Index

REBYX:

10.21%

SCHA:

9.42%

Daily Std Dev

REBYX:

23.81%

SCHA:

24.12%

Max Drawdown

REBYX:

-60.05%

SCHA:

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

REBYX:

-16.29%

SCHA:

-13.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REBYX achieves a -7.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's -6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, REBYX has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 6.45%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.


REBYX

YTD

-7.94%

1M

4.00%

6M

-15.99%

1Y

-4.23%

3Y*

3.08%

5Y*

11.07%

10Y*

6.45%

SCHA

YTD

-6.36%

1M

5.27%

6M

-13.60%

1Y

2.26%

3Y*

6.12%

5Y*

10.72%

10Y*

7.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

REBYX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

REBYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

REBYX vs. SCHA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REBYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REBYX is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REBYX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REBYX is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REBYX is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REBYX is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REBYX is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHA is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

REBYX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current REBYX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REBYX and SCHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

REBYX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

REBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.16%, more than SCHA's 1.62% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
14.16%13.03%2.63%5.30%31.12%0.64%4.47%18.61%12.51%0.88%8.23%7.67%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.62%1.51%1.43%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.62%1.24%1.50%1.48%1.45%

Drawdowns

REBYX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REBYX drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REBYX and SCHA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

REBYX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 6.31% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...