RDVI vs. BXSL
RDVI (FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, RDVI returned 19.56%/yr vs 5.19%/yr for BXSL. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RDVI vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -3.65% return.
RDVI
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.18%
BXSL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 1Y
- -13.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.69M | $37.65M | $42.77M | |
| $26.62M | $24.09M | $18.88M |
RDVI vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 19.32% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 8.29% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -3.65% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and BXSL is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
BXSL
RDVI vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.91 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | -0.67 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | -0.98 | +16.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and BXSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -36.80% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -20.06% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -24.21% | +5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.21% | +18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -14.32% | +11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 13.75% | -11.73% |
Volatility
RDVI vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is 3.65%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that RDVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 5.15% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 16.14% | -5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 20.83% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 23.71% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 23.71% | -6.88% |
Dividends
RDVI vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than BXSL's 12.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 12.95% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% |
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.58% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVI and BXSL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to RDVI (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs BXSL's -36.80%.
RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVI and BXSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer