RDVI vs. BXSL
RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, RDVI returned 18.62%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for BXSL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RDVI vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.70% return.
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BXSL
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -11.93%
- 1Y
- -17.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDVI vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 9.43% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 9.91% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -8.70% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and BXSL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
BXSL
RDVI vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.87 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | -0.74 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | -1.13 | +13.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | -0.87 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.29 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and BXSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -36.80% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -23.47% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -24.21% | +5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -22.50% | +22.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -14.12% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 15.37% | -13.36% |
Volatility
RDVI vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is 3.66%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that RDVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.04% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 16.24% | -5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 19.90% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 23.73% | -6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 23.73% | -6.82% |
Dividends
RDVI vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, less than BXSL's 13.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 13.24% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.94% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVI and BXSL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to RDVI (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs BXSL's -36.80%.
RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVI and BXSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer