RDOG vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
RDOG and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both RDOG and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RDOG or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| RDOG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.44% | 34.22% |
| 1Y Return | 33.17% | 47.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.85% | 11.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.49% | 21.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.90% | 16.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.55 | 2.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.28 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.96 | 3.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.78 | 14.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.28% | 3.10% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.68% | 17.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.88% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.07% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and SCHG is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RDOG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 34.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 3.90%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDOG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RDOG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RDOG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 5.90% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 2.98% | 5.11% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% | 2.90% | 1.03% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -69.88%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RDOG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.85%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.