PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RDIV having a 13.43% return and MGV slightly lower at 13.05%. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 11.09%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
0.14%
1M
2.82%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.91%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.09%

MGV

1D
0.89%
1M
4.32%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.92%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
13.43%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
13.05%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and MGV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.80

The correlation between RDIV and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
MGV

Energy

28.8%
6.6%

Financial Services

18.0%
23.9%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
3.7%

Real Estate

8.0%
1.2%

Healthcare

7.8%
16.6%

Utilities

6.4%
2.6%

Technology

5.1%
14.2%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Industrials

-

13.7%

Energy

RDIV
28.8%
MGV
6.6%

Financial Services

RDIV
18.0%
MGV
23.9%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.9%
MGV
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
9.5%
MGV
3.7%

Real Estate

RDIV
8.0%
MGV
1.2%

Healthcare

RDIV
7.8%
MGV
16.6%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
MGV
2.6%

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
MGV
14.2%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
MGV
2.4%

Communication Services

RDIV

-

MGV
3.4%

Industrials

RDIV

-

MGV
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDIVMGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

2.80

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

3.99

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

4.30

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.06

16.33

+1.73

RDIV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDIVMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.80

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.89

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-55.87%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-6.42%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-13.18%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-16.54%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-35.41%

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-7.70%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.68%

-0.04%

Volatility

RDIV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.61%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.61%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

7.50%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

9.83%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

13.56%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

16.34%

+5.55%

RDIV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than MGV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.89%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.61%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and MGV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to MGV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs MGV's -55.87%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.81% vs 11.09% for RDIV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.89% for MGV.

RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer