RDFN vs. SE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RDFN (Redfin Corporation) and SE (Sea Limited) are both stocks. RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while SE operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RDFN vs. SE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Sea Limited (SE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SE

• 1D: -3.95%
• 1M: 4.74%
• YTD: -29.87%
• 6M: -33.75%
• 1Y: -46.03%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: -19.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDFN vs. SE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	24.04%
SE Sea Limited	-29.87%	20.24%	161.98%	-22.16%	-76.74%	12.39%	394.90%	255.30%	-15.08%	-18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RDFN and SE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017	0.35

The correlation between RDFN and SE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) RDFN : $1.04B SE : $25.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) RDFN : $364.02M SE : $11.15B
EBITDA (TTM) RDFN : -$129.82M SE : $2.33B

Return for Risk

RDFN vs. SE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE

SE Risk / Return Rank: 9
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFN vs. SE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Sea Limited (SE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.35	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.51%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-60.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-60.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-75.62%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-44.02%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	35.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	50.27%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	64.07%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	62.63%	—

Dividends

RDFN vs. SE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDFN nor SE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDFN and SE in my portfolio?

RDFN and SE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.