RDFN vs. SE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Sea Limited (SE).

Performance

RDFN vs. SE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Sea Limited (SE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RDFN vs. SE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	24.04%
SE Sea Limited	-35.09%	20.24%	161.98%	-22.16%	-76.74%	12.39%	394.90%	255.30%	-15.08%	-18.02%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) RDFN : $1.04B SE : $22.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) RDFN : $364.02M SE : $10.24B
EBITDA (TTM) RDFN : -$129.82M SE : $2.21B

Returns By Period

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SE

• 1D: 5.75%
• 1M: -23.64%
• YTD: -35.09%
• 6M: -53.67%
• 1Y: -36.54%
• 3Y*: -1.46%
• 5Y*: -18.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RDFN vs. SE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE

SE Risk / Return Rank: 15
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFN vs. SE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Sea Limited (SE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.34	—

Correlation

The correlation between RDFN and SE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RDFN vs. SE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDFN nor SE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.51%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-60.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-77.44%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-43.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDFN	SE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	52.29%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	64.23%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	62.84%	—

Financials