RDFI vs. CEFS

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 4.63% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, less than CEFS's 8.62% yield.

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 1.61%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.