PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDCM vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RDCM vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RADCOM Ltd. (RDCM) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDCM achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 22.90% return.


RDCM

1D
-14.80%
1M
-23.00%
YTD
-5.81%
6M
-5.08%
1Y
-6.88%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
0.50%

ZIM

1D
-0.83%
1M
-9.34%
YTD
22.90%
6M
30.26%
1Y
55.08%
3Y*
45.96%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDCM vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RDCM
RADCOM Ltd.
-5.81%5.83%53.35%-26.33%-16.17%31.55%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
22.90%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RDCM and ZIM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RDCM:

$210.33M

ZIM:

$3.04B

EPS

RDCM:

$0.75

ZIM:

$0.81

PE Ratio

RDCM:

16.52

ZIM:

31.07

PEG Ratio

RDCM:

0.36

ZIM:

0.18

PS Ratio

RDCM:

2.84

ZIM:

0.48

PB Ratio

RDCM:

1.77

ZIM:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

RDCM:

$73.49M

ZIM:

$6.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RDCM:

$55.85M

ZIM:

$676.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

RDCM:

$10.60M

ZIM:

$1.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RADCOM Ltd.

Return for Risk

RDCM vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDCM
RDCM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RDCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDCM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RDCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDCM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDCM vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RADCOM Ltd. (RDCM) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDCMZIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

1.81

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

4.35

-4.88

RDCM vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDCM Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDCM and ZIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDCMZIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

1.04

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.33

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.76

-0.81

Drawdowns

RDCM vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDCM drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDCM and ZIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDCMZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.49%

-84.68%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.66%

-30.66%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.73%

-57.12%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.95%

-84.68%

+37.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.41%

-11.59%

-72.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.51%

-40.01%

-45.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.04%

12.69%

+0.35%

Volatility

RDCM vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

RADCOM Ltd. (RDCM) has a higher volatility of 19.34% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 11.65%. This indicates that RDCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDCMZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.34%

11.65%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.57%

37.56%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.86%

53.11%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.73%

65.88%

-24.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.51%

67.68%

-25.17%

Dividends

RDCM vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

RDCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RDCM
RADCOM Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.95%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%

Financials

RDCM vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RADCOM Ltd. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
18.59M
1.40B
(RDCM) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RDCM vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RADCOM Ltd. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
75.6%
3.4%
Portfolio components
RDCM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RADCOM Ltd. reported a gross profit of 14.04M and revenue of 18.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.6%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.

RDCM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RADCOM Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.18M and revenue of 18.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

RDCM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RADCOM Ltd. reported a net income of 3.08M and revenue of 18.59M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDCM and ZIM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDCM has higher volatility (19.34%) compared to ZIM (11.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDCM dropped -99.49% vs ZIM's -84.68%.

ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDCM and ZIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer