RCTIX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
RCTIX is managed by River Canyon. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | -0.97% | 7.75% | 7.49% | 10.02% | -4.07% | 4.26% | 6.42% | 11.71% | 1.82% | 9.76% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -1.11% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTIX achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly higher than MNHYX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.
RCTIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCTIX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
RCTIX
MNHYX
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCTIX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.24 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 1.64 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.23 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 4.86 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCTIX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.24 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.71 | 1.46 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 1.79 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTIX and MNHYX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
RCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than MNHYX's 6.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | 6.83% | 7.31% | 7.89% | 8.50% | 5.98% | 3.02% | 5.97% | 4.97% | 3.30% | 4.89% | 2.16% | 0.00% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.93% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTIX drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTIX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTIX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -19.70% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -3.38% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.17% | -10.84% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.89% | -19.70% | +8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.20% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -1.57% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.86% | -0.48% |
Volatility
RCTIX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) is 0.91%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that RCTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCTIX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 1.50% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 2.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 3.66% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 3.66% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 4.15% | -0.41% |