PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
RCL vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RCL vs. SMH

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RCL or SMH.

Correlation

The correlation between RCL and SMH is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RCL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

RCL:

23.53%

SMH:

42.82%

Max Drawdown

RCL:

-1.38%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

RCL:

0.00%

SMH:

-20.22%

Returns By Period

RCL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMH

YTD

-7.75%

1M

10.97%

6M

-13.48%

1Y

0.49%

5Y*

28.43%

10Y*

24.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RCL vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RCL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RCL is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RCL is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RCL is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RCL is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RCL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RCL is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RCL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

RCL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than SMH's 0.48% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.		0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF		0.48%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

RCL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -1.38%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

RCL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...