RCL vs. COST

In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RCL has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.45%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.96% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RCL Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCL and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than COST's 0.48% yield.

The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a higher volatility of 23.99% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 10.36%. This indicates that RCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.