RCKT vs. BMRN
RCKT (Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and BMRN (BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, RCKT returned -19.30%/yr vs -4.89%/yr for BMRN. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCKT vs. BMRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCKT achieves a -11.40% return, which is significantly lower than BMRN's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RCKT has underperformed BMRN with an annualized return of -19.30%, while BMRN has yielded a comparatively higher -4.89% annualized return.
RCKT
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- -19.01%
- 6M
- -10.63%
- YTD
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- -44.17%
- 5Y*
- -38.66%
- 10Y*
- -19.30%
- ALL TIME*
- -16.47%
BMRN
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- -12.31%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- -4.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.77M | $94.81M | $117.56M | |
| $4.18M | $6.56M | $7.93M |
RCKT vs. BMRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCKT Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -11.40% | -72.08% | -58.06% | 53.14% | -10.35% | -60.19% | 140.95% | 53.58% | 41.95% | -57.21% |
BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0.99% | -9.58% | -31.83% | -6.83% | 17.14% | 0.75% | 3.71% | -0.70% | -4.51% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCKT and BMRN is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015 | 0.38 |
The correlation between RCKT and BMRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RCKT:
$339.59M
BMRN:
$11.60B
RCKT:
-$1.88
BMRN:
$1.37
RCKT:
1.47
BMRN:
1.91
RCKT:
$0.00
BMRN:
$3.24B
RCKT:
$0.00
BMRN:
$2.46B
RCKT:
-$198.01M
BMRN:
$439.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCKT vs. BMRN — Risk / Return Rank
RCKT
BMRN
RCKT vs. BMRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCKT | BMRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 0.17 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 0.33 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCKT vs. BMRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCKT drawdown since its inception was -96.70%, which is greater than BMRN's maximum drawdown of -90.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCKT and BMRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCKT | BMRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.70% | -90.58% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.94% | -22.49% | -28.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.71% | -49.83% | -42.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.63% | -57.64% | -35.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.46% | -62.09% | -34.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.59% | -59.75% | -35.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.86% | -45.59% | -23.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.29% | 11.43% | +13.86% |
Volatility
RCKT vs. BMRN - Volatility Comparison
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) has a higher volatility of 17.08% compared to BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) at 6.24%. This indicates that RCKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCKT | BMRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.08% | 6.24% | +10.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.52% | 22.14% | +29.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.50% | 34.43% | +41.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.36% | 32.93% | +45.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.48% | 35.03% | +48.45% |
Dividends
RCKT vs. BMRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither RCKT nor BMRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RCKT vs. BMRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RCKT and BMRN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCKT has higher volatility (17.08%) compared to BMRN (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCKT dropped -96.70% vs BMRN's -90.58%.
BMRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCKT and BMRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer